<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Fake &#8216;smart car&#8217; crash picture</title> <atom:link href="http://www.lovemysmartcar.com/2009/fake-smart-car-crash-picture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.lovemysmartcar.com/2009/fake-smart-car-crash-picture/</link> <description>Just another WordPress weblog</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:26:11 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Mark</title><link>http://www.lovemysmartcar.com/2009/fake-smart-car-crash-picture/#comment-336</link> <dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 07:14:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://lovemysmartcar.com/?p=15#comment-336</guid> <description>Hi Rachel.  You are right, No car could have survived that accident.  The two trucks of immense mass makes sure of that.But in regards to your comment about reviewing &quot;literature and reviews&quot; you may be (and I would say are probably) wrong about smart cars being more safe than larger cars with a worse rating.  Although they may have a higher rating than larger cars, you have to keep in mind that every size class of car has a different scale to measure up against, and cars in differing size/weight cannot be compared with each other.  Such comparisons are meaningless.Two important non-subjective points are the following:1) Mass difference:
Mass plays a huge role in terms of &quot;who wins&quot; in an accident.  We learned about this in high school physics.  Force = mass x acceleration.  When two cars crash, you can say that the two cars experience the same force.  But because the smart car weighs a lot less, its &quot;acceleration&quot; is a lot higher during a collisions...  In (non high school physics) technical terms, that means that during a collision, the person in a smart car will experience a much higher jolt or degree of whiplash during collision, regardless of how strong the chassis of the smart car may be.2) Crumple zones:
In &quot;non smart&quot; cars, the trunk or engine bay will absorb force during a collision by crumpling in.  On a non smart car, there is no engine bay or trunk that can do that...  So the next best thing is to add force limiters on the seat belts, to add a little &quot;give&quot; during a collision, so that the seat belts wont shatter your bones during a collision.  But it is much much less effective than having 4 feet of engine to &quot;give&quot; and absorb the forces.People often get the wrong idea after watching a smart car crash against a normal car.  They see the smart car plow through the engine bay of a normal car, destroying the front of the normal car while the smart car retains its shape.  They conclude that the smart car is better built and better at protecting the passengers.  This is false conclusion because of my point above;  The fact that normal cars are crumpling in the engine bay or trunk is a life saving feature.The truth is that the best thing engineers can do for the occupants in a smart car is to ensure that the passenger cabin does not collapse and lead to smushed up people during a typical accident, and the smart car engineers have done that very well.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rachel.  You are right, No car could have survived that accident.  The two trucks of immense mass makes sure of that.</p><p>But in regards to your comment about reviewing &#8220;literature and reviews&#8221; you may be (and I would say are probably) wrong about smart cars being more safe than larger cars with a worse rating.  Although they may have a higher rating than larger cars, you have to keep in mind that every size class of car has a different scale to measure up against, and cars in differing size/weight cannot be compared with each other.  Such comparisons are meaningless.</p><p>Two important non-subjective points are the following:</p><p>1) Mass difference:<br
/> Mass plays a huge role in terms of &#8220;who wins&#8221; in an accident.  We learned about this in high school physics.  Force = mass x acceleration.  When two cars crash, you can say that the two cars experience the same force.  But because the smart car weighs a lot less, its &#8220;acceleration&#8221; is a lot higher during a collisions&#8230;  In (non high school physics) technical terms, that means that during a collision, the person in a smart car will experience a much higher jolt or degree of whiplash during collision, regardless of how strong the chassis of the smart car may be.</p><p>2) Crumple zones:<br
/> In &#8220;non smart&#8221; cars, the trunk or engine bay will absorb force during a collision by crumpling in.  On a non smart car, there is no engine bay or trunk that can do that&#8230;  So the next best thing is to add force limiters on the seat belts, to add a little &#8220;give&#8221; during a collision, so that the seat belts wont shatter your bones during a collision.  But it is much much less effective than having 4 feet of engine to &#8220;give&#8221; and absorb the forces.</p><p>People often get the wrong idea after watching a smart car crash against a normal car.  They see the smart car plow through the engine bay of a normal car, destroying the front of the normal car while the smart car retains its shape.  They conclude that the smart car is better built and better at protecting the passengers.  This is false conclusion because of my point above;  The fact that normal cars are crumpling in the engine bay or trunk is a life saving feature.</p><p>The truth is that the best thing engineers can do for the occupants in a smart car is to ensure that the passenger cabin does not collapse and lead to smushed up people during a typical accident, and the smart car engineers have done that very well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Yikes!!! - HCS Snowmobile Forums</title><link>http://www.lovemysmartcar.com/2009/fake-smart-car-crash-picture/#comment-333</link> <dc:creator>Yikes!!! - HCS Snowmobile Forums</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:53:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://lovemysmartcar.com/?p=15#comment-333</guid> <description>[...] is probably this pic. Fake &#8216;smart car&#8217; crash picture &#124; love my smart car But we all believe what we see on the net.     __________________ I&#039;m still [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is probably this pic. Fake &#8216;smart car&#8217; crash picture | love my smart car But we all believe what we see on the net.     __________________ I&#039;m still [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: &#187; Smart Car Accident Photos</title><link>http://www.lovemysmartcar.com/2009/fake-smart-car-crash-picture/#comment-322</link> <dc:creator>&#187; Smart Car Accident Photos</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:50:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://lovemysmartcar.com/?p=15#comment-322</guid> <description>[...] http://lovemysmartcar.com http://www.bestgore.com http://www.america-smart-car-guide.com [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a
href="http://lovemysmartcar.com" rel="nofollow">http://lovemysmartcar.com</a> <a
href="http://www.bestgore.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.bestgore.com</a> <a
href="http://www.america-smart-car-guide.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.america-smart-car-guide.com</a> [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rachel Nabors</title><link>http://www.lovemysmartcar.com/2009/fake-smart-car-crash-picture/#comment-314</link> <dc:creator>Rachel Nabors</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 19:23:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://lovemysmartcar.com/?p=15#comment-314</guid> <description>That suggests that the only way to feel protected is to engage in a &quot;vehicular arms race.&quot; But we can&#039;t all drive tanks!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That suggests that the only way to feel protected is to engage in a &#8220;vehicular arms race.&#8221; But we can&#8217;t all drive tanks!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: crowbar</title><link>http://www.lovemysmartcar.com/2009/fake-smart-car-crash-picture/#comment-313</link> <dc:creator>crowbar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 19:11:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://lovemysmartcar.com/?p=15#comment-313</guid> <description>Irregardless of what is perceived as dangerous, you can be injured/killed when your protection is exceeded by the force of the impact. Don&#039;t care what we drive. The chance of escape from accidents is usually relevant to one&#039;s defensive driving habits. Not always though. Hit a full size pickup head-on riding my motorcycle (60 mph combined speed)because the truck driver was in a hurry and crossed the center line of a local highway to turn into a car wash. He was late for a date, had to have his ride clean before picking up his date. I had absence of chance to even think about braking, move out of the way, etc. Had less than .3 seconds to react. So for all those that want to state / defend / slander one vehicle&#039;s safety over another, you may want to rethink how you may perceive vehicular &quot;protection&quot;. It&#039;s what I call &quot;Perceived and Non-Perceived Dangers&quot;. Again, when your protection is rendered weak by a stronger force, you lose. It&#039;s that simple.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Irregardless of what is perceived as dangerous, you can be injured/killed when your protection is exceeded by the force of the impact. Don&#8217;t care what we drive. The chance of escape from accidents is usually relevant to one&#8217;s defensive driving habits. Not always though. Hit a full size pickup head-on riding my motorcycle (60 mph combined speed)because the truck driver was in a hurry and crossed the center line of a local highway to turn into a car wash. He was late for a date, had to have his ride clean before picking up his date. I had absence of chance to even think about braking, move out of the way, etc. Had less than .3 seconds to react. So for all those that want to state / defend / slander one vehicle&#8217;s safety over another, you may want to rethink how you may perceive vehicular &#8220;protection&#8221;. It&#8217;s what I call &#8220;Perceived and Non-Perceived Dangers&#8221;. Again, when your protection is rendered weak by a stronger force, you lose. It&#8217;s that simple.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Raleigh</title><link>http://www.lovemysmartcar.com/2009/fake-smart-car-crash-picture/#comment-307</link> <dc:creator>Raleigh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 02:33:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://lovemysmartcar.com/?p=15#comment-307</guid> <description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDQrPnAhSmI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lB0araA0T_k
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mz-s1sIoLhU&amp;NR=1
please watch these videos and tel me which one would you rather be driving i mean seriously not all larger cars will preform better and plus do you know who made those very intreging little cars MERCEDES BENZ and honestly who makes cars better than the germans.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDQrPnAhSmI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDQrPnAhSmI</a><br
/> <a
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lB0araA0T_k" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lB0araA0T_k</a><br
/> <a
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mz-s1sIoLhU&#038;NR=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mz-s1sIoLhU&#038;NR=1</a><br
/> please watch these videos and tel me which one would you rather be driving i mean seriously not all larger cars will preform better and plus do you know who made those very intreging little cars MERCEDES BENZ and honestly who makes cars better than the germans.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Phill</title><link>http://www.lovemysmartcar.com/2009/fake-smart-car-crash-picture/#comment-289</link> <dc:creator>Phill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 01:30:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://lovemysmartcar.com/?p=15#comment-289</guid> <description>Rachel,You are spot on. It really sucks that when you google Smart car crash you get pictures that aren&#039;t even of a Smart.Here is another one.
http://www.moral-flexibility.net/archives/2007/09/18/smartcar-accident-photos-but-not-quite/comment-page-1/#comment-85718The vehicle in this one looks more like a Honda CRV.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rachel,</p><p>You are spot on. It really sucks that when you google Smart car crash you get pictures that aren&#8217;t even of a Smart.</p><p>Here is another one.<br
/> <a
href="http://www.moral-flexibility.net/archives/2007/09/18/smartcar-accident-photos-but-not-quite/comment-page-1/#comment-85718" rel="nofollow">http://www.moral-flexibility.net/archives/2007/09/18/smartcar-accident-photos-but-not-quite/comment-page-1/#comment-85718</a></p><p>The vehicle in this one looks more like a Honda CRV.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David</title><link>http://www.lovemysmartcar.com/2009/fake-smart-car-crash-picture/#comment-287</link> <dc:creator>David</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:45:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://lovemysmartcar.com/?p=15#comment-287</guid> <description>OK, the pictures been out there for a while and there&#039;s been lots of talk about whether or not it&#039;s a Smart.  Obviously, it is not a Smart.  As for the pic has been &quot;shopped&quot; - absolutely not! You can check it out and check out the pixel image for yourself.  It doesn&#039;t matter how much you enlarge the picture, the pixels match, there are no lines being hidden and so forth. As for the damage on the red truck, look at the drivers side. The hood doesn&#039;t get folded up into the windshield on a low speed collision. The front of the truck is also pushed back a fair bit, again, not going to happen in a low speed collision!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, the pictures been out there for a while and there&#8217;s been lots of talk about whether or not it&#8217;s a Smart.  Obviously, it is not a Smart.  As for the pic has been &#8220;shopped&#8221; &#8211; absolutely not! You can check it out and check out the pixel image for yourself.  It doesn&#8217;t matter how much you enlarge the picture, the pixels match, there are no lines being hidden and so forth. As for the damage on the red truck, look at the drivers side. The hood doesn&#8217;t get folded up into the windshield on a low speed collision. The front of the truck is also pushed back a fair bit, again, not going to happen in a low speed collision!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike M</title><link>http://www.lovemysmartcar.com/2009/fake-smart-car-crash-picture/#comment-284</link> <dc:creator>Mike M</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 15:31:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://lovemysmartcar.com/?p=15#comment-284</guid> <description>Rachel, motorcycles represent the vehicles with HIGHEST manueverability and unobscured driver visibility.  The point being is that even minor accidents for normal sized vehicles are fatal ones for motorcycles and, more often than not, because the operator FAILED to utilize those two safety advantages.  Your assertion that &#039;SUV drivers are more reckless&#039; is about as true as motorcycle or Smartcar drivers will be more careful. Statistics will bear me out that such is NOT the real world.Size matters ... PERIOD.  The smaller/lighter the vehicle - the greater the chance of getting killed in it.I&#039;ve been riding on motorcycles for over 40 years BTW.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rachel, motorcycles represent the vehicles with HIGHEST manueverability and unobscured driver visibility.  The point being is that even minor accidents for normal sized vehicles are fatal ones for motorcycles and, more often than not, because the operator FAILED to utilize those two safety advantages.  Your assertion that &#8216;SUV drivers are more reckless&#8217; is about as true as motorcycle or Smartcar drivers will be more careful. Statistics will bear me out that such is NOT the real world.</p><p>Size matters &#8230; PERIOD.  The smaller/lighter the vehicle &#8211; the greater the chance of getting killed in it.</p><p>I&#8217;ve been riding on motorcycles for over 40 years BTW.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: john hough</title><link>http://www.lovemysmartcar.com/2009/fake-smart-car-crash-picture/#comment-275</link> <dc:creator>john hough</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 18:54:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://lovemysmartcar.com/?p=15#comment-275</guid> <description>everybody thinks that bigger is better and safer..NOT SO..i treated a woman in the E.R. that was in a front end collision at 10mph and DIED while in a lincoln towncar!1..how?..headsnap..broke her neck  the smartcar scored 4stars and has been doing well on the road...easier to stop..has a speed limitastion of 65 due to its 3 cylindars and its roll cage...yet nobody seems to complain about motorbike accidents!!  goes to show..NEVER JUDGE A CAR..BY ITS SIZE!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>everybody thinks that bigger is better and safer..NOT SO..i treated a woman in the E.R. that was in a front end collision at 10mph and DIED while in a lincoln towncar!1..how?..headsnap..broke her neck  the smartcar scored 4stars and has been doing well on the road&#8230;easier to stop..has a speed limitastion of 65 due to its 3 cylindars and its roll cage&#8230;yet nobody seems to complain about motorbike accidents!!  goes to show..NEVER JUDGE A CAR..BY ITS SIZE!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 12/17 queries in 0.110 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: media.lovemysmartcar.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.lovemysmartcar.com @ 2012-05-18 14:39:33 -->
